The Most Important Communication
Event in a Decade (Maybe in 50 Years!)
On Thursday, the nation will be glued to their televisions watching the Senate Judiciary Committee as they hear testimony in Judge Bret Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court hearings. The big deal is that his sexual misconduct accuser, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, will testify in front of the committee about an event that allegedly happened when both attended the same prep school. According to Dr. Ford, he attempted to rape her at a party back in the early 1980s. He strongly denies it.
The corroborating evidence for Dr. Ford’s story is almost nonexistent. No one at the party, including a third person in the bedroom when the attack allegedly happened, can recall anything about the event. Even Dr. Ford cannot recall details like the date or location of the party. There are lots of details about Judge Kavanaugh’s life and background that paint a picture of someone who might do such a thing, i.e., a history of alcohol abuse, innuendos about inappropriate prep school sexual activities, and now, even a second woman who claims he exposed himself to her at a party when he was at Yale.
The Republicans want him confirmed before the November elections. So, of course, they do not believe Dr. Ford. The Democrats want to delay Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation until after the election in the hope that the predicted “blue wave” will give them a congressional majority. If that happens, all bets are off for who gets nominated for the vacancy on the highest court in the land. In fact, if this appointment fails, it may spell the end of the Trump presidency.
This is a case of “he said, she said.” He has the blueblood, ivy league, old-boy’s aristocracy on his side. Her story, on the other hand, has all the earmarks of how sexual assault cases play out, according to experts. The challenge for Ford, and the Democrats, and even the fall elections is: CREDIBILITY.
Dr. Ford is going to voluntarily put herself in a political pressure cooker of unimaginable psychological stress. In front of a congressional committee, half of whom hate her guts and desperately want her to fail. On national television. Death threats. Consequences that could bring down a president. No pressure!
On top of that, she is by nature a bookish intellectual whose area of expertise is statistical analysis of psychological research. Not exactly the profile of someone comfortable in front of TV cameras and hostile questioning designed to trip her up.
Like a tornado baring down on that congressional hearing room this coming Thursday, Dr. Ford’s ability to communicate believably will LITTERALLY effect the future of our county. No shit. Seriously.
Be very, very clear: communication is not some “light-weight, nice to have,” silly little “soft skill” that the English majors and social scientists worry about. Dr. Ford’s performance in front of that committee, the TV cameras, the country, and the world can determine our future. Communication – a soft skill?
I urge you to clear your calendar for Thursday* and take it all in. In particular, watch for things that can increase Dr. Ford’s believability, or, conversely, undercut her effectiveness.
First of all, the most important thing is her content. Is her story clear and compelling? Does she have a consistent and repeated message, something like, “Judge Kavanaugh’s sexual violence toward me broke my spirit for decades. He does not belong on the highest court in the land.”
Secondly, we know from decades of research, that non-verbals are more persuasive than words. Here is what to look for. Done well, non-verbals communicate confidence. Done poorly, they can create doubt in the listener’s mind.
When she’s being questioned, she should make strong eye contact with the questioner. The wrong thing to do: look down or look away in a dismissive fashion. Her answers should include eye contact with the questioner about 50% of the time; but also, she should make eye contact with others on the committee. (Rule of thumb: maintain eye contact for 3-4 seconds, or the length of a sentence, before moving on to look at someone else.)
Voice and Pace
As John Wayne once said, “Talk low, talk slow, and don’t say too much.” Good advice. High tones indicate stress, low ones, confidence. People under stress talk fast. Slow down.
A confident speaker lets an idea sink in before moving on. Pausing for as long as 3-4 seconds between key ideas reflects confidence.
Nervous speakers use tiny gestures held close to the body. That hurts their believability. To convey confidence, gestures should be away from the body. Some people gesture constantly when they are excited (or nervous). If seated, nervous people may keep their hands under the table on their lap.
Confident speakers use moderate gestures to help the listener follow the content. For example, “A year ago (gesture to the right), then today (in front of body), and next year we expect…”(gesture to the left).
Dress and Appearance
Hopefully, Dr. Ford will dress in a business-appropriate way that reflects the import of this moment. Bracelets, earrings, necklaces should be quality, understated items. Dangling earrings can be very distracting. In other words, she shouldn’t give anyone reason to pay more attention to how she is dressed, than what she’s saying.
This is a hugely significant moment in our history, especially against the background of the #MeToo movement, and the unpopularity of this president. I’m tuning in on Thursday to be a part of it. Hope you will too.
P.S. Let me know what you think about Dr. Ford’s believability.
* As of this writing, Monday evening, there started to be doubt that the Thursday event would even happen. Stay tuned!
7 thoughts on “Dr. Christine Blasey Ford: Believable?”
This should be read by all.
Excellent bit of writing.
You write that the Republicans in Congress do not believe Dr. Ford. Therefore, your perspective is that she needs to be believable. While I certainly want her to be believed and I want her to show up with as much credibility as possible, I have a different perspective. I believe that the Republicans in Congress do not want to believe her and even if they do believe her, they are going to override their own moral compass for political expediency regardless of how believable she appears. I think our two party system encourages this kind of behavior. I feel despair for Dr. Ford and the ramifications for other women and our country.
Wow! Great observations and insights. This whole situation is disgusting so it was nice to have a rational view.
Hi Rick, Thanks for the PS review. I am not sure I want to watch this
Republicrook’s farce. The situation is clearly loaded in favor of 11 white men. I will be happy if Dr. Ford gets out with a positive presence. I’m not hoping for much more.
Very astute analysis, Rick. Thanks!
This is very interesting, what to watch for in Dr. Ford. But the farcical, unfair “rules” and structure the Committee has set up and the fact they are bringing in no other witnesses to testify make the hearing ridiculously unfair to begin with.
Your guidelines will make it more interesting to watch, for sure! Thanks!
I watched the entire proceedings….I rarely do this. I found Dr Ford to be credible. I thought Kavanaugh was scary…political and not capable of impartiality. I also fear that he will be wearing robe soon as I do not believe any of the Republican Senators have to guts to vote against confirmation.